![]() In response to such discussions, Hardin revised his thesis in 1991 to the "tragedy of the (unmanaged) commons". Elinor Ostrom (2009 Nobel Prize in Economics Science winner) shared examples of small communities coordinating to share common resources without expending them without falling back on the rule of law to enforce these arrangements, while economist and academic Dieter Helm commented that these examples were unrepresentative of broader societal tendencies, stating that if such covenants were typical, " destruction of nature would have not occurred". Whilst cited extensively, the paper also continues to attract criticism from anthropologists and historians. ![]() In 1968 ecologist Garrett Hardin published in Science the essay "tragedy of the commons", in which he stated that commonly used land is destined for ruin unless its capacity is well above its number of users. Provided as a hypothetical example, some have claimed that real-world common pastureland did not befall this fate. While it may appear economically rational to an individual to over-consume in this context as doing so bears no immediate personal cost, such common land became barren and even permanently ruined where sufficient numbers of herders engaged in such activity. Lloyd supposed that, should common land parcels shared between cattle herders in Great Britain and Ireland (known as " the commons" in Anglo-Saxon Law) come to ruin, this should be attributed to those herders that allowed more than their allocated quota of cattle to graze on them. Men pay most attention to what is their own: they care less for what is common." The foundation for scholarly discussion of the topic however came in an 1833 essay by British economist William Forster Lloyd. Aristotle wrote that "That which is common to the greatest number gets the least amount of care. The concept of unrestricted-access resources becoming spent, where personal use does not incur personal expense, has been discussed for millennia. If users of such resources act to maximise their self-interest and do not coordinate with others to maximise the overall common good, exhaustion and even permanent destruction of the resource may result, if the number of the users and the amount they demand exceeds what is available. The context specificity of our study matches the calls for heavily contextualised IS research.The tragedy of the commons is a phenomenon described in economics and ecology in which common resources, to which access is not regulated by formal rules or fees /taxes levied based on individual use, tend to become depleted. Thus, we contribute both to the general IS continuance literature as well as to the specific area of exergaming. We also offer explanations for these relationships, thus providing a first understanding of the previously unmapped area of how users behave situation‐dependently after critical exergaming incidents. Our findings provide a greater understanding of IS use continuance by revealing new knowledge about the relationships between specific situational characteristics (ie, purpose of use, type of gaming platform, social setting, place, and exertion level) and use continuance. To do this, we quantita tively and qualitatively examined 461 actual critical exergaming incidents. To address these gaps, we investigate the relationships between specific situational characteristics and use continuance after critical exergaming incidents, in which the user has an exceptionally positive or negative experience. However, their potential remains unreached because users tend to discontinue usage after their initial experiences. Studying exergames is deemed important due to their potential in providing health benefits for users, revenues for providers, and well‐being for societies. Furthermore, the link between situational context and use continuance has remained unexplored in the novel area of “exergames,” which are defined as digital games requiring physical effort from the player that determines the outcome of the game. Previous research has shown that situational context can be central for IS use continuance but has paid limited attention to its specific characteristics. Use continuance is crucial in terms of information systems (IS) success.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |